JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 24, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00121.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1193    most recent
00121.2009v2
00121.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, C. L
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, C. L
Submitted on February 9, 2009
Revised on May 28, 2009
Accepted on June 13, 2009

Effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists on laryngeal neurophysiology in the rat

Xin Feng1, Victor M Henriquez1, Judith R Walters2, and Christy L Ludlow1*

1 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
2 NIH NINCDS

Hypophonia is an early symptom in Parkinson's disease a that involves an increase in laryngeal muscle activity, interfering with voice production. Our aim was to use an animal model to better understand the role of different dopamine receptor subtypes in the control of laryngeal neurophysiology. First, we evaluated the combined effects of SCH23390-a D1 receptor antagonist with a D2 receptor antagonist (eticlopride) on laryngeal neurophysiology, and then tested the separate effects of selective receptor antagonists. Thyroarytenoid (TA) and gastrocnemius (GN) muscle activity was measured at rest and while stimulating the internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve (iSLN) to elicit the laryngeal adductor response (LAR) in alpha-chloralose anesthetized rats. Paired stimuli at different inter-stimulus intervals between 250 and 5000 ms measured central conditioning of the LAR. Changes in resting muscle activity, response latency, amplitude and LAR conditioning after each drug were compared with the saline control. SCH23390 alone increased the resting TA muscle activity (p < 0.05). With the combined SCH23390 + eticlopride or SCH23390 alone, response latency decreased (p < 0.01), amplitude increased (p < 0.01) and the test LAR was reduced at 2000 ms ISI (p < 0.01). No LAR changes occurred when eticlopride was administrated alone at a low dose and only a tendency to suppress responses was found at a high dose. No changes in GN muscle activity occurred in any of the groups. The results suggest that a loss of stimulation of D1 receptors plays a significant role in laryngeal pathophysiology in PD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.