JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 1, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00167.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Audio and Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1606    most recent
00167.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kusmierek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rauschecker, J. P
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kusmierek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rauschecker, J. P
Submitted on February 25, 2009
Revised on June 24, 2009
Accepted on June 25, 2009

Functional specialization of medial auditory belt cortex in the alert rhesus monkey

Pawel Kusmierek1* and Josef P Rauschecker1

1 Georgetown University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pk83{at}georgetown.edu.

Responses of neural units in two areas of the medial auditory belt (middle medial area MM, and rostral medial area RM) were tested with tones, noise bursts, monkey calls (MC), and environmental sounds (ES) in microelectrode recordings from two alert rhesus monkeys. For comparison, recordings were also performed from two core areas (primary auditory area A1, and rostral area R) of the auditory cortex. All four fields showed cochleotopic organization, with best center frequency (BFc) gradients running in opposite directions in A1 and MM than in R and RM. The medial belt was characterized by a stronger preference for band-pass noise than for pure tones found medially to the core areas. Response latencies were shorter for the two more posterior (middle) areas MM and A1 than for the two rostral areas R and RM, reaching values as low as 6 ms for high BFc in MM and A1, and strongly depended on BFc. The medial belt areas exhibited a higher selectivity to all stimuli, in particular to noise bursts, than the core areas. An increased selectivity to tones and noise bursts was also found in the anterior fields; the opposite was true for highly temporally-modulated ES. Analysis of the structure of neural responses revealed that neurons were driven by low-level acoustic features in all fields. Thus, medial belt areas RM and MM have to be considered early stages of auditory cortical processing. The antero-posterior difference in temporal processing indices suggests that R and RM may belong to a different hierarchical level or a different computational network than A1 and MM.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Carrasco and S. G. Lomber
Evidence for Hierarchical Processing in Cat Auditory Cortex: Nonreciprocal Influence of Primary Auditory Cortex on the Posterior Auditory Field
J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14323 - 14333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.