JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 1, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00289.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1503    most recent
00289.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lauritzen, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomsen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lauritzen, M.
Submitted on March 31, 2009
Revised on June 26, 2009
Accepted on June 26, 2009

Principle cell spiking, post-synaptic excitation and oxygen consumption in the rat cerebellar cortex

Kirsten Thomsen1*, Henning Piilgaard1, Albert Gjedde1, Gilles Bonvento2, and Martin Lauritzen1

1 University of Copenhagen
2 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kthomsen{at}sund.ku.dk.

One contention within the field of neuroimaging concerns the character of the depicted activity - does it represent neuronal action potential generation, i.e., spiking, or post-synaptic excitation? This question is related to the metabolic costs of different aspects of neurosignaling. The cerebellar cortex is well-suited for addressing this problem, as synaptic input to and spiking of the principle cell, the Purkinje cell (PC), are spatially segregated. Also, PCs are pacemakers, able to generate spikes endogenously. We examined the contributions to cerebellar cortical oxygen consumption (CMRO2) of post-synaptic excitation and PC spiking during evoked and on-going neuronal activity in the rat. By inhibiting excitatory synaptic input using ionotropic glutamate receptor blockers, we found that the increase in CMRO2 evoked by parallel fiber (PF) stimulation depended entirely upon post-synaptic excitation. In contrast, PC spiking was largely responsible for the increase in CMRO2 when on-going neuronal activity was increased by GABAA receptor blockade. In this case, CMRO2 increased equally during PC spiking with excitatory synaptic activity as during PC pacemaker spiking without excitatory synaptic input. Subsequent inhibition of action potential propagation and neurotransmission by blocking voltage-gated Na+-channels eliminated the increases in CMRO2 due to PF stimulation and increased PC spiking, but left a large fraction of CMRO2, i.e., basal CMRO2, intact. In conclusion, while basal CMRO2 in anesthetized animals did not seem to be related to neurosignaling, increases in CMRO2 could be induced by all aspects of neurosignaling. Our findings imply that CMRO2 responses cannot a priori be assigned to specific neuronal activities.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.