JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 24, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00346.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures and Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1254    most recent
00346.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chisari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mennerick, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chisari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mennerick, S.
Submitted on April 17, 2009
Revised on May 27, 2009
Accepted on June 16, 2009

The influence of neuroactive steroid lipophilicity on GABAA receptor modulation: evidence for a low affinity interaction

Mariangela Chisari1, Lawrence N Eisenman2, Kathiresan Krishnan1, Achintya K Bandyopadhyaya, Cunde Wang, Amanda Taylor1, Ann Benz1, Douglas F Covey1, Charles F Zorumski2, and Steven Mennerick1*

1 Washington University School of Med
2 Washingon Univ. School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: menneris{at}psychiatry.wustl.edu.

Anesthetic steroids with actions at GABAA receptors may access transmembrane domain binding site(s) directly from the plasma cell membrane. Accordingly, the effective concentration in lipid phase and the ability of the steroid to meet pharmacophore requirements for activity will both contribute to observed steady-state potency. Furthermore, onset and offset of receptor effects may be rate limited by lipid partitioning. Here we show that several GABA-active steroids, including naturally occurring neurosteroids, of different lipophilicity differ in kinetics and potency at GABAA receptors. The hydrophobicity ranking predicted relative potency of GABAA receptor potentiation and predicted current offset kinetics. Kinetic offset differences among steroids were largely eliminated by {gamma}-cyclodextrin, a scavenger of unbound steroid, suggesting that affinity differences among the analogues are dwarfed by the contributions of non-specific accumulation. An NBD-tagged fluorescent analogue of the low-lipophilicity alphaxalone (C17-NBD-alphaxalone) exhibited faster non-specific accumulation and departitioning than a fluorescent analogue of the high-lipophilicity (3{alpha},5{alpha})-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one (C17-NBD-3{alpha}5{alpha}A). These differences were paralleled by differences in potentiation of GABAA receptor function. The enantiomer of C17-NBD-3{alpha}5{alpha}A, which does not satisfy pharmacophore requirements for steroid potentiation, exhibited identical fluorescence kinetics and distribution to C17-NBD-3{alpha}5{alpha}A, but was inactive at GABAA receptors. Simple simulations supported our major findings, which suggest that neurosteroid binding affinity is low. Therefore, both specific (e.g., fulfilling pharmacophore requirements) and non-specific (e.g., lipid solubility) properties contribute to the potency and longevity of anesthetic steroid action.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.