JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 2, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00474.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/3398    most recent
00474.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Hooser, S. D
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Hooser, S. D
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S. B
Submitted on May 16, 2003
Accepted on June 30, 2003

Receptive field properties and laminar organization of lateral geniculate nucleus in the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)

Stephen D Van Hooser1*, J. A. F Heimel1, and Sacha B Nelson1

1 Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vanhoosr{at}brandeis.edu.

Physiological studies of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) have revealed three classes of relay neurons, called X, Y, and W cells in carnivores and parvocellular (P), magnocellular (M), and koniocellular (K) in primates. The homological relationships among these cell classes and how receptive field (RF) properties of these cells compare to LGN cells in other mammals are poorly understood. To address these questions, we have characterized RF properties and laminar organization in LGN of a highly visual diurnal rodent, the gray squirrel, under isoflurane anesthesia. We identified three classes of LGN cells. One class found in layers 1 and 2 showed sustained, reliable firing, center-surround organization, and was almost exclusively linear in spatial summation. Another class, found in layer 3, showed short response latencies, transient and reliable firing, center-surround organization, and could show either linear (76%) or non-linear (24%) spatial summation. A third, heterogeneous class found throughout the LGN but primarily in layer 3 showed highly variable responses, a variety of response latencies, and could show either center-surround or non-center-surround receptive field organization and either linear (77%) or non-linear (23%) spatial summation. RF sizes of all cell classes showed little dependence on eccentricity, and all of these classes showed low contrast gains. When compared with LGN cells in other mammals, our data are consistent with the idea that all mammals contain three basic classes of LGN neurons, one showing reliable, sustained responses and center-surround organization (X or P), another showing transient but reliable responses, short latencies, and center-surround organization (Y or M), and a third, highly variable and heterogeneous class of cells (W or K). Other properties such as dependence of receptive field size on eccentricity, linearity of spatial summation, and contrast gain appear to vary from species to species.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.