JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 22, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00580.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/2399    most recent
00580.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ciaramitaro, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boynton, G. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ciaramitaro, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boynton, G. M
Submitted on May 22, 2007
Accepted on August 17, 2007

Spatial and cross-modal attention alter responses to unattended sensory information in early visual and auditory human cortex

Vivian Maria Ciaramitaro1*, Giedrius T Buracas2, and Geoffrey M Boynton3

1 SNL, The Salk Institute, 10010 North Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, California, 92037, United States; Psychology, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, California, 92093-0109, United States
2 Center for Functional Magentic Resonance Imaging, UCSD, La Jolla, California, United States
3 SNL, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vivian{at}salk.edu.

Attending to a visual or auditory stimulus often requires irrelevant information to be filtered out, both within the modality attended, and in other modalities. For example, attentively listening to a phone conversation can diminish our ability to detect visual events. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine brain responses to visual and auditory stimuli while subjects attended visual or auditory information. Although early cortical areas are traditionally considered uni-modal, we found that brain response to the same ignored information depended on the modality attended. In early visual area V1, responses to ignored visual stimuli were weaker when attending another visual stimulus, as compared to attending an auditory stimulus. The opposite was true in more central visual area MT+, where responses to ignored visual stimuli were weaker when attending an auditory stimulus. Furthermore, fMRI responses to the same ignored visual information depended on the location of the auditory stimulus, with stronger responses when the attended auditory stimulus shared the same side of space as the ignored visual stimulus. In early auditory cortex, responses to ignored auditory stimuli were weaker when attending a visual stimulus. A simple parameterization of our data can describe the effects of redirecting attention across space within a modality (spatial attention) or across modalities (cross-modal attention), and the influence of spatial attention across modalities (cross-modal spatial attention). Our results suggest that the representation of unattended information depends on whether attention is directed to another stimulus in the same modality, or the same region of space.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A.R. Mayer, A.R. Franco, J. Canive, and D.L. Harrington
The Effects of Stimulus Modality and Frequency of Stimulus Presentation on Cross-modal Distraction
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2009; 19(5): 993 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.