JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 24, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.00829.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Whelan, P. J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Whelan, P. J
Submitted on July 25, 2007
Accepted on April 13, 2008

The Interaction Between Developing Spinal Locomotor Networks in the Neonatal Mouse

Ian Thomas Gordon1, Mary J Dunbar2, Kimberley J Vanneste2, and Patrick J Whelan2*

1 Calgary, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
2 Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: whelan{at}ucalgary.ca.

At birth, thoracosacral spinal cord networks in mouse can produce a coordinated locomotor-like pattern. In contrast, less is known about the cervicothoracic networks that generate forelimb locomotion. Here we show that cervical networks can produce coordinated rhythmic patterns in the brainstem-spinal cord preparation of the mouse. Segmentally the C5 and C8 neurograms were each found to be alternating left-right, and the ipsilateral C5 and C8 neurograms also alternated. Collectively these patterns were suggestive of locomotor-like activity. This pattern was not dependent on the presence of thoracosacral segments since they could be evoked following a complete transection of the spinal cord at T5. We next demonstrated that activation of thoracosacral networks either pharmacologically or by stimulation of sacrocaudal afferents could produce rhythmic activity within the C5 and C8 neurograms. On the other hand, pharmacological activation of cervical networks did not evoke alternating cervical rhythmic activity either in isolated cervicothoracic or cervicosacral preparations. Under these conditions, we found that activation of cervicothoracic networks could alter the timing of thoracosacral locomotor-like patterns. When thoracosacral networks were not activated pharmacologically, but received rhythmic drive from cervicothoracic networks, a pattern of slow bursts with superimposed fast synchronous oscillations became the dominant lumbar neurogram pattern. Our data suggest that in neonatal mice the cervical CPG is capable of producing coordinated rhythmic patterns in the absence of input from lumbar segments, but caudorostral drive contributes to cervical patterns and rhythm stability.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.