JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 21, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00844.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, K. R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, K. R
Submitted on September 15, 2009
Revised on October 15, 2009
Accepted on October 17, 2009

Motor outputs in a multi-tasking network: Relative contributions of inputs and experience-dependent network states.

Allyson Kimberly Friedman1, Yuriy Zhurov1, Bjoern Ch. Ludwar1, and Klaudiusz R Weiss2*

1 Mount Sinai School of Medicine
2 Mt. Sinai School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: klaudiusz.weiss{at}mssm.edu.

Network outputs elicited by a specific stimulus may differ radically depending on the momentary network state. One class of networks states, experience-dependent states, is known to operate in numerous networks, yet the fundamental question concerning the relative role that inputs and states play in determining the network outputs remains to be investigated in a behaviorally relevant manner. Because previous work indicated that in the isolated nervous system the motor outputs of the Aplysia feeding network are affected by experience dependent states, we sought to establish the behavioral relevance of these outputs. We analyzed the phasing of firing of radula opening motoneurons (B44 and B48) relative to other previously characterized motoneurons. We found that the overall pattern of motoneuronal firing corresponds to the phasing of movements during feeding behavior thus indicating a behavioral relevance of network outputs. Previous studies suggested that network inputs act to trigger a response rather than to shape its characteristics, with the latter function being fulfilled by network states. We show this is an over simplification. In a rested state, different inputs elicited distinct responses indicating that inputs not only trigger but also shape the responses. However, depending on the combination of inputs and states, responses were either dramatically altered by the network state or were indistinguishable from those observed in the rested state. We suggest that the relative contributions of inputs and states are dynamically regulated and, rather than being fixed, depend on the specifics of states and inputs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.