JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 412-421, 2008. First published May 14, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90312.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/1/412    most recent
90312.2008v2
90312.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bompas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sumner, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bompas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sumner, P.

Naso-Temporal Asymmetry for Signals Invisible to the Retinotectal Pathway

Aline Bompas1, Thomas Sterling2, Robert D. Rafal3 and Petroc Sumner1

1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; 2Division of Neuroscience, Imperial College London, United Kingdom; and 3Wolfson Centre for Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom

Submitted 27 February 2008; accepted in final form 7 May 2008

Monocular viewing conditions show an asymmetry between stimuli presented in the temporal and nasal visual fields in their efficiency for automatically triggering eye saccades and grasping attention. For instance, observers free to make a saccade to one of two stimuli presented together orient preferentially to the temporal stimulus. Such naso-temporal asymmetry (NTA) has been assumed to reflect the asymmetry in the retinotectal pathway to the superior colliculus. We tested this hypothesis using S cone stimuli, which are invisible to the magnocellular and retinotectal pathways. The observed NTA in choice saccades to bilateral stimuli was no less present for S cone stimuli than for luminance stimuli. Additionally, the amplitude of the NTA can be enhanced when S cone signals are added to luminance signals. These results suggest that behavioral NTA in humans is not diagnostic of retinotectal mediation. Furthermore, we found no asymmetries in latency, suggesting that the NTA in saccade choice does not originate simply from a bottom-up asymmetry in any low level visual pathways.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Bompas, Cardiff School of Psychology, Tower Bldg., Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK (E-mail: bompasa{at}cardiff.ac.uk)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Bompas and P. Sumner
Oculomotor Distraction by Signals Invisible to the Retinotectal and Magnocellular Pathways
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2387 - 2395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.