| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Program in Neuroscience and Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore; and 2Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Submitted 7 December 2007; accepted in final form 29 January 2008
In all sensory systems, information is processed along several parallel streams. In the vibrissa-to-barrel cortex system, these include the lemniscal system and the lesser-known paralemniscal system. The posterior medial nucleus (POm) is the thalamic structure associated with the latter pathway. Previous studies suggested that POm response latencies are positively correlated with stimulation frequency and negatively correlated with response duration, providing a basis for a phase locked loop-temporal decoding of stimulus frequency. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing response latencies of POm neurons, in both awake and anesthetized rats, to vibrissae deflections at frequencies between 0.3 and 11 Hz. We found no significant, systematic correlation between stimulation frequency and the latency or duration of POm responses. We obtained similar findings from recording in awake rats, in rats under different anesthetics, and in anesthetized rats in which the reticular activating system was stimulated. These findings suggest that stimulus frequency is not reliably reflected in response latency of POm neurons. We also tested the hypothesis that POm neurons respond preferentially to sensor motion, that is, they respond to whisking in air, without contacts. We recorded from awake, head-restrained rats while monitoring vibrissae movements. All POm neurons responded to passive whisker deflections, but none responded to noncontact whisking. Thus like their counterparts in the trigeminal ganglion, POm neurons may not reliably encode whisking kinematics. These observations suggest that POm neurons might not faithfully encode vibrissae inputs to provide reliable information on vibrissae movements or contacts.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. P. J. de Kock and B. Sakmann Spiking in primary somatosensory cortex during natural whisking in awake head-restrained rats is cell-type specific PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16446 - 16450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Chakrabarti and K. D. Alloway Differential Response Patterns in the SI Barrel and Septal Compartments During Mechanical Whisker Stimulation J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1632 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Masri, R. L. Quiton, J. M. Lucas, P. D. Murray, S. M. Thompson, and A. Keller Zona Incerta: A Role in Central Pain J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 181 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Khatri, R. Bermejo, J. C. Brumberg, A. Keller, and H. P. Zeigler Whisking in Air: Encoding of Kinematics by Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons in Awake Rats J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1836 - 1846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Furuta, T. Kaneko, and M. Deschenes Septal Neurons in Barrel Cortex Derive Their Receptive Field Input from the Lemniscal Pathway J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 4089 - 4095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Ahissar, D. Golomb, S. Haidarliu, R. Sosnik, and C. Yu Latency Coding in POm: Importance of Parametric Regimes J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1152 - 1154. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Masri, T. Bezdudnaya, J. C. Trageser, and A. Keller Reply to Ahissar et al. J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1155 - 1157. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chakrabarti, M. Zhang, and K. D. Alloway MI Neuronal Responses to Peripheral Whisker Stimulation: Relationship to Neuronal Activity in SI Barrels and Septa J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 50 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
