HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/2/829    most recent 00030.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sestieri, C. Articles by Corbetta, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sestieri, C. Articles by Corbetta, M.

Independence of Anticipatory Signals for Spatial Attention From Number of Nontarget Stimuli in the Visual Field

¹Department of Clinical Sciences and Bioimaging, G. d'Annunzio University and ²Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy; and ³Department of Neurology, ⁴Department of Radiology, and ⁵Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 9 January 2008; accepted in final form 3 June 2008

Covertly attending to a location modulates the activity of visual areas even in the absence of visual stimulation. These effects are widespread, being found in the cortical representations of both attended and unattended portions of the visual field. It is not clear, however, whether preparatory modulations depend on subjects' expectation regarding the presence of additional nontarget stimuli in the visual field. Here, we asked subjects to endogenously direct attention to a peripheral location in the upper visual field, to identify the orientation of a low-contrast target stimulus, and we manipulated the number and behavioral relevance of other low-contrast nontarget stimuli in the visual field. Anticipatory (i.e., prestimulus) blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) signal increments in visual cortex were strongest at the contralateral attended location, whereas signal decrements were strongest at the unattended mirror-opposite ipsilateral location/region of visual cortex. Importantly, these strong anticipatory decrements were not related to the presence/absence of nontarget low-contrast stimuli and did not correlate with either weaker target-evoked responses or worse performance. Second, the presence of other low-contrast stimuli in the visual field, even when potential targets, did not modify the anticipatory signal modulation either at target or nontarget locations. We conclude that the topography of spatial attention–related anticipatory BOLD signal modulation across visual cortex, specifically decrements at unattended locations, is mainly determined by processes at the cued location and not by the number or behavioral relevance of distant low-contrast nontarget stimuli elsewhere in the visual field.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Busch, J. Dubois, and R. VanRullen The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7869 - 7876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Capotosto, C. Babiloni, G. L. Romani, and M. Corbetta Frontoparietal Cortex Controls Spatial Attention through Modulation of Anticipatory Alpha Rhythms J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5863 - 5872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]