HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/3/1223    most recent 90219.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Farina, D. Articles by Enoka, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Farina, D. Articles by Enoka, R. M.

Detecting the Unique Representation of Motor-Unit Action Potentials in the Surface Electromyogram

¹Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; ²Laboratory for Engineering of the Neuromuscular System, Department of Electronics, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy; and ³Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado

Submitted 1 February 2008; accepted in final form 6 May 2008

This study investigated the relative proportion of motor-unit action potentials that are uniquely represented in the simulated and experimental surface electromyogram (EMG). Two hundred motor units were simulated in a cylindrical anatomical system. Action potentials for each motor unit were generated with a model and then compared with those of other motor units. Pairs of motor units were considered indistinguishable and the motor units not uniquely represented in the surface EMG, when the difference in the mean energy for the pair of potentials was <5%. The anatomical conditions and recording configurations had a substantial influence on the percentage of motor units that could be uniquely identified in the simulated EMG. For example, a single monopolar channel could discriminate only 3.4% of motor units in the simulated population, whereas a system with 81 Laplacian channels arranged in a grid could discriminate 83.8% of the motor units under the same conditions. The simulation results were confirmed with populations of motor units recorded experimentally from the abductor digiti minimi muscle of eight healthy men. Furthermore, the relative proportion of uniquely identified motor units in the simulated signal was only moderately related to motor-unit size and distance from the electrodes. These results indicate the upper limit for detection of individual motor units from the surface EMG and show that a few channels of surface EMG recordings are not sufficient to study single motor units. The noninvasive identification of motor units from the surface EMG requires the use of multiple channels of information.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Farina, A. Holobar, M. Gazzoni, D. Zazula, R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka Adjustments Differ Among Low-Threshold Motor Units During Intermittent, Isometric Contractions J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 350 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]