JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 1936-1948, 2008. First published July 30, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90290.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/1936    most recent
90290.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Marchena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Philpot, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Marchena, J.
Right arrow Articles by Philpot, B. D.

NMDA Receptor Antagonists Reveal Age-Dependent Differences in the Properties of Visual Cortical Plasticity

Jacqueline de Marchena1, Adam C. Roberts2,3, Paul G. Middlebrooks3, Vera Valakh4, Koji Yashiro3, Lindsey R. Wilfley3 and Benjamin D. Philpot1,2,3

1Curriculum in Neurobiology, 2Neuroscience Center, 3Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, and 4Summer Undergraduate Research Experience Program; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Submitted 21 February 2008; accepted in final form 22 July 2008

The suggestion that NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-dependent plasticity is subunit specific, with NR2B-types required for long-term depression (LTD) and NR2A-types critical for the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP), has generated much attention and considerable debate. By investigating the suggested subunit-specific roles of NMDARs in the mouse primary visual cortex over development, we report several important findings that clarify the roles of NMDAR subtypes in synaptic plasticity. We observed that LTD was not attenuated by application of ifenprodil, an NR2B-type antagonist, or NVP-AAM007, a less selective NR2A-type antagonist. However, we were surprised that NVP-AAM007 completely blocked adult LTP (postnatal day (P) 45–90), while only modestly affecting juvenile LTP (P21-28). To assess whether this developmental transition reflected an increasing role for NR2A-type receptors with maturity, we characterized the specificity of NVP-AAM007. We found not only that NVP-AAM007 lacks discernable subunit specificity but also that the effects of NVP-AAM077 on LTP could be mimicked using subsaturating concentrations of APV, a global NMDAR antagonist. These results indicate that the effects of NVP-AAM077 on synaptic plasticity are largely explained by nonspecific blockade of NMDARs. Moreover our findings are the first to reveal a developmental increase in the sensitivity of LTP to NMDAR antagonism. We suggest that discrepant reports describing the effect of NVP-AAM077 on LTP may be partially explained by this developmental shift in the properties of LTP. These results indicate that the degree of NMDAR activation required for LTP increases with development, providing insight into a novel underlying mechanism governing the properties of synaptic plasticity.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. D. Philpot, 5109E Neuroscience Research Bldg., Campus Box 7545, 115 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7545 (E-mail: bphilpot{at}med.unc.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. K. A. Cho, L. Khibnik, B. D. Philpot, and M. F. Bear
The ratio of NR2A/B NMDA receptor subunits determines the qualities of ocular dominance plasticity in visual cortex
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5377 - 5382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.