HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/4/2101    most recent 90703.2008v2 90703.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mikulic, A. Articles by Dorris, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mikulic, A. Articles by Dorris, M. C.

Temporal and Spatial Allocation of Motor Preparation During a Mixed-Strategy Game

Areh Mikuli and Michael C. Dorris

Department of Physiology, Centre for Neuroscience Studies and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group in Sensory-Motor Systems, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 23 June 2008; accepted in final form 23 July 2008

Adopting a mixed response strategy in competitive situations can prevent opponents from exploiting predictable play. What drives stochastic action selection is unclear given that choice patterns suggest that, on average, players are indifferent to available options during mixed-strategy equilibria. To gain insight into this stochastic selection process, we examined how motor preparation was allocated during a mixed-strategy game. If selection processes on each trial reflect a global indifference between options, then there should be no bias in motor preparation (unbiased preparation hypothesis). If, however, differences exist in the desirability of options on each trial then motor preparation should be biased toward the preferred option (biased preparation hypothesis). We tested between these alternatives by examining how saccade preparation was allocated as human subjects competed against an adaptive computer opponent in an oculomotor version of the game "matching pennies." Subjects were free to choose between two visual targets using a saccadic eye movement. Saccade preparation was probed by occasionally flashing a visual distractor at a range of times preceding target presentation. The probability that a distractor would evoke a saccade error, and when it failed to do so, the probability of choosing each of the subsequent targets quantified the temporal and spatial evolution of saccade preparation, respectively. Our results show that saccade preparation became increasingly biased as the time of target presentation approached. Specifically, the spatial locus to which saccade preparation was directed varied from trial to trial, and its time course depended on task timing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Thevarajah, A. Mikulic, and M. C. Dorris Role of the Superior Colliculus in Choosing Mixed-Strategy Saccades J. Neurosci., February 18, 2009; 29(7): 1998 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]