JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 2684-2701, 2008. First published September 3, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90427.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/2684    most recent
90427.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molineux, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molineux, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. W.

Ionic Factors Governing Rebound Burst Phenotype in Rat Deep Cerebellar Neurons

Michael L. Molineux, W. Hamish Mehaffey, Reza Tadayonnejad, Dustin Anderson, Adrien F. Tennent and Ray W. Turner

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Submitted 1 April 2008; accepted in final form 27 August 2008

Large diameter cells in rat deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) can be distinguished according to the generation of a transient or weak rebound burst and the expression of T-type Ca2+ channel isoforms. We studied the ionic basis for the distinction in burst phenotypes in rat DCN cells in vitro. Following a hyperpolarization, transient burst cells generated a high-frequency spike burst of ≤450 Hz, whereas weak burst cells generated a lower-frequency increase (<140 Hz). Both cell types expressed a low voltage–activated (LVA) Ca2+ current near threshold for rebound burst discharge (–50 mV) that was consistent with T-type Ca2+ current, but on average 7 times more current was recorded in transient burst cells. The number and frequency of spikes in rebound bursts was tightly correlated with the peak Ca2+ current at –50 mV, showing a direct relationship between the availability of LVA Ca2+ current and spike output. Transient burst cells exhibited a larger spike depolarizing afterpotential that was insensitive to blockers of voltage-gated Na+ or Ca2+ channels. In comparison, weak burst cells exhibited larger afterhyperpolarizations (AHPs) that reduced cell excitability and rebound spike output. The sensitivity of AHPs to Ca2+ channel blockers suggests that both LVA and high voltage–activated (HVA) Ca2+ channels trigger AHPs in weak burst compared with only HVA Ca2+ channels in transient burst cells. The two burst phenotypes in rat DCN cells thus derive in part from a difference in the availability of LVA Ca2+ current following a hyperpolarization and a differential activation of AHPs that establish distinct levels of membrane excitability.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. W. Turner, Hotchkiss Brain Inst., Univ. of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1 (E-mail: rwturner{at}ucalgary.ca)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.