HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figures and Tables All Versions of this Article: 100/5/2712    most recent 90210.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by von Kriegstein, K. Articles by McAlpine, D. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by von Kriegstein, K. Articles by McAlpine, D.

Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex

¹Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, and ²Ear Institute, University College London, London; ³Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; and ⁴Medical Research Council Brain and Cognition Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Submitted 30 January 2008; accepted in final form 11 September 2008

Humans use differences in the timing of sounds at the two ears to determine the location of a sound source. Various models have been posited for the neural representation of these interaural time differences (ITDs). These models make opposing predictions about the lateralization of ITD processing in the human brain. The weighted-image model predicts that sounds leading in time at one ear activate maximally the opposite brain hemisphere for all values of ITD. In contrast, the -limit model assumes that ITDs beyond half the period of the stimulus center frequency are not explicitly encoded in the brain and that such "long" ITDs activate maximally the side of the brain to which the sound is heard. A previous neuroimaging study revealed activity in the human inferior colliculus consistent with the -limit. Here we show that cortical responses to sounds with ITDs within the -limit are in line with the predictions of both models. However, contrary to the immediate predictions of both models, neural activation is bilateral for "long" ITDs, despite these being perceived as clearly lateralized. Furthermore, processing of long ITDs leads to higher activation in cortex than processing of short ITDs. These data show that coding of ITD in cortex is fundamentally different from coding of ITD in the brain stem. We discuss these results in the context of the two models.