JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 2771-2783, 2008. First published September 24, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90799.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/2771    most recent
90799.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milenkovic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milenkovic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lewin, G. R.

Speed and Temperature Dependences of Mechanotransduction in Afferent Fibers Recorded From the Mouse Saphenous Nerve

Nevena Milenkovic, Christiane Wetzel, Rabih Moshourab and Gary R. Lewin

Department of Neuroscience, Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Submitted 17 July 2008; accepted in final form 15 September 2008

Here we have systematically characterized the stimulus response properties of mechanosensitive sensory fibers in the mouse saphenous nerve. We tested mechanoreceptors and nociceptors with defined displacement stimuli of varying amplitude and velocity. For each sensory afferent investigated we measured the mechanical latency, which is the delay between the onset of a ramp displacement and the first evoked spike, corrected for conduction delay. Mechanical latency plotted as a function of stimulus strength was very characteristic for each receptor type and was very short for rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors (<11 ms) but very long in myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptors (49–114 ms). Increasing the stimulus speed decreased mechanical latency in all receptor types with the notable exception of C-fiber nociceptors, in which mean mechanical latency was not reduced lsim100 ms, even with very fast ramp stimuli (2,945 µm/s). We examined stimulus response functions and mechanical latency at two different temperatures (24 and 32°C) and found that stimulus response properties of almost all mechanoreceptors were not altered in this range. A notable exception to this rule was found for C-fibers in which mechanical latency was substantially increased and stimulus response functions decreased at lower temperatures. We calculated Q10 values for mechanical latency in C-fibers to be 5.1; in contrast, the Q10 value for conduction velocity for the same fibers was 1.4. Finally, we examined the effects of short-term inflammation (2–6 h) induced by carrageenan on nociceptor and mechanoreceptor sensitivity. We did not detect robust changes in mechanical latency or stimulus response functions after inflammation that might have reflected mechanical sensitization under the conditions tested.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. R. Lewin, Department of Neuroscience, Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Buch, Robert-Rössle Str. 10, Berlin D-13092, Germany (E-mail: glewin{at}mdc-berlin.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.