HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/6/3225    most recent 90570.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leijnse, J.N.A.L. Articles by Quesada, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leijnse, J.N.A.L. Articles by Quesada, P. M.

Assessment of Individual Finger Muscle Activity in the Extensor Digitorum Communis by Surface EMG

Departments of ¹Mechanical Engineering and ³Industrial Engineering, Speed School of Engineering and ²Hand and Upper Extremity Research Laboratory, Price Institute for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

Submitted 16 May 2008; accepted in final form 17 July 2008

The extensor digitorum communis (ED) is a slender muscle group in the dorsal forearm from which tendons arise to the index (D2), medius (D3), ring (D4), and little (D5) fingers. Limited independence has been attributed to the parts that actuate the individual fingers. However, in a detailed anatomical analysis, it was found that the ED parts to the different fingers have constant and widely spaced anatomical locations that promote independent function. These observations and the superficial muscle belly locations prompted the hypothesis that these ED parts would be individually assessable by small anatomically placed surface EMG electrodes. In the present study, this hypothesis was evaluated by measuring electromyography (EMG) from the ED parts and surrounding muscles during individual finger tapping tasks with the forearm resting on a flat surface. It was found that individual ED activity can be well measured in ED2, ED3, ED4, and extensor digiti minimi (EDM). ED3 did not give nor did its electrodes receive significant crosstalk from other ED parts. ED4 electrodes recorded an EMG level of 30 ± 19% (mean ± SD) ED2 EMG in D2 tapping and ED2 electrodes a level of 53 ± 22% ED4 EMG in D4 tapping, by hypothesis mostly crosstalk. EDM electrodes may record EMG at the level of ED4 EMG in D4 tapping. In D2 tapping, the mutual ED2 and extensor indicis redundancy reflected in large intersubject EMG differences with sometimes one or the other almost silent. The results may expand the possibilities of EMG analysis and finger muscle electrostimulation in ergonomic and clinical applications.