HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/6/3394    most recent 01272.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kiemel, T. Articles by Jeka, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kiemel, T. Articles by Jeka, J. J.

Identification of the Plant for Upright Stance in Humans: Multiple Movement Patterns From a Single Neural Strategy

¹Department of Kinesiology and ²Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

Submitted 23 September 2008; accepted in final form 25 September 2008

We determined properties of the plant during human upright stance using a closed-loop system identification method originally applied to human postural control by another group. To identify the plant, which was operationally defined as the mapping from muscle activation (rectified EMG signals) to body segment angles, we rotated the visual scene about the axis through the subject's ankles using a sum-of-sines stimulus signal. Because EMG signals from ankle muscles and from hip and lower trunk muscles showed similar responses to the visual perturbation across frequency, we combined EMG signals from all recorded muscles into a single plant input. Body kinematics were described by the trunk and leg angles in the sagittal plane. The phase responses of both angles to visual scene angle were similar at low frequencies and approached a difference of 150° at higher frequencies. Therefore we considered leg and trunk angles as separate plant outputs. We modeled the plant with a two-joint (ankle and hip) model of the body, a second-order low-pass filter from EMG activity to active joint torques, and intrinsic stiffness and damping at both joints. The results indicated that the in-phase (ankle) pattern was neurally generated, whereas the out-of-phase pattern was caused by plant dynamics. Thus a single neural strategy leads to multiple kinematic patterns. Moreover, estimated intrinsic stiffness in the model was insufficient to stabilize the plant.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. D. Goodworth and R. J. Peterka Contribution of Sensorimotor Integration to Spinal Stabilization in Humans J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 496 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]