JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 3407-3416, 2008. First published October 22, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90921.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/3407    most recent
90921.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rose, G. J.

Mechanisms of Long-Interval Selectivity in Midbrain Auditory Neurons: Roles of Excitation, Inhibition, and Plasticity

Christofer J. Edwards, Christopher J. Leary and Gary J. Rose

Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Stereotyped intervals between successive sound pulses characterize the acoustic signals of anurans and other organisms and provide critical information to receivers. One class of midbrain neuron responds selectively when pulses are repeated at slow rates (long intervals). To examine the mechanisms that underlie long-interval selectivity, we made whole cell recordings, in vivo, from neurons in the anuran inferior colliculus (anuran IC). In most cases, long-pass interval selectivity appeared to arise from interplay between excitation and inhibition; in ~25% of these cases, the delayed inhibition to a pulse overlapped with the excitation to the following pulse at fast pulse repetition rates (PRRs), resulting in a phasic "onset" response. In the remaining cases, inhibition appeared to precede excitation. These neurons did not respond to fast PRRs apparently because delayed excitation to a pulse overlapped with the inhibition to the following pulse. These results suggest that the relative timing of inhibition and excitation govern differences in the response properties of these two cell types. Loading cells with cesium increased their responses to fast AM rates, supporting a role for inhibition in long-interval selectivity. Three cells showed little or no evidence of inhibition and exhibited strong depression of excitation. These findings are discussed in the context of current models for long-pass interval selectivity.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. J. Rose, Dept. of Biology University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 East, Rm 204, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (E-mail: rose{at}bioscience.utah.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. A. Carlson
Temporal-Pattern Recognition by Single Neurons in a Sensory Pathway Devoted to Social Communication Behavior
J. Neurosci., July 29, 2009; 29(30): 9417 - 9428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Creutzig, S. Wohlgemuth, A. Stumpner, J. Benda, B. Ronacher, and A. V. M. Herz
Timescale-Invariant Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by a Bursting Neuron
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2575 - 2580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.