JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 3445-3457, 2008. First published October 1, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90833.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/3445    most recent
90833.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V.

INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY

Toward Optimal Target Placement for Neural Prosthetic Devices

John P. Cunningham1, Byron M. Yu1,4,5, Vikash Gilja2, Stephen I. Ryu3 and Krishna V. Shenoy1,4

1Departments of Electrical Engineering, 2Computer Science, and 3Neurosurgery, and 4Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California; and 5Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit University College London, London, United Kingdom

Submitted 30 July 2008; accepted in final form 19 September 2008

Neural prosthetic systems have been designed to estimate continuous reach trajectories (motor prostheses) and to predict discrete reach targets (communication prostheses). In the latter case, reach targets are typically decoded from neural spiking activity during an instructed delay period before the reach begins. Such systems use targets placed in radially symmetric geometries independent of the tuning properties of the neurons available. Here we seek to automate the target placement process and increase decode accuracy in communication prostheses by selecting target locations based on the neural population at hand. Motor prostheses that incorporate intended target information could also benefit from this consideration. We present an optimal target placement algorithm that approximately maximizes decode accuracy with respect to target locations. In simulated neural spiking data fit from two monkeys, the optimal target placement algorithm yielded statistically significant improvements up to 8 and 9% for two and sixteen targets, respectively. For four and eight targets, gains were more modest, as the target layouts found by the algorithm closely resembled the canonical layouts. We trained a monkey in this paradigm and tested the algorithm with experimental neural data to confirm some of the results found in simulation. In all, the algorithm can serve not only to create new target layouts that outperform canonical layouts, but it can also confirm or help select among multiple canonical layouts. The optimal target placement algorithm developed here is the first algorithm of its kind, and it should both improve decode accuracy and help automate target placement for neural prostheses.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Shenoy, CISX 319, 330 Serra Mall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4075 (E-mail: shenoy{at}stanford.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, V. Gilja, S. I. Ryu, A. Afshar, M. Sahani, and K. V. Shenoy
Factor-Analysis Methods for Higher-Performance Neural Prostheses
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1315 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.