JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 350-359, 2009. First published November 12, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90968.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/350    most recent
90968.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farina, D.
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farina, D.
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M.

Adjustments Differ Among Low-Threshold Motor Units During Intermittent, Isometric Contractions

Dario Farina1, Ales Holobar2,3, Marco Gazzoni3, Damjan Zazula2, Roberto Merletti3 and Roger M. Enoka4

1Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; 2Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia; 3Laboratorio di Ingegneria del Sistema Neuromuscolare, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy; and 4Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado

Submitted 27 August 2008; accepted in final form 4 November 2008

We investigated the changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity, recruitment and derecruitment thresholds, and discharge rate of low-threshold motor units during a series of ramp contractions. The aim was to compare the adjustments in motor unit activity relative to the duration that each motor unit was active during the task. Multichannel surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle of eight healthy men during 12-s contractions (n = 25) in which the force increased and decreased linearly from 0 to 10% of the maximum. The maximal force exhibited a modest decline (8.5 ± 9.3%; P < 0.05) at the end of the task. The discharge times of 73 motor units that were active for 16–98% of the time during the first five contractions were identified throughout the task by decomposition of the EMG signals. Action potential conduction velocity decreased during the task by a greater amount for motor units that were initially active for >70% of the time compared with that of less active motor units. Moreover, recruitment and derecruitment thresholds increased for these most active motor units, whereas the thresholds decreased for the less active motor units. Another 18 motor units were recruited at an average of 171 ± 32 s after the beginning of the task. The recruitment and derecruitment thresholds of these units decreased during the task, but muscle fiber conduction velocity did not change. These results indicate that low-threshold motor units exhibit individual adjustments in muscle fiber conduction velocity and motor neuron activation that depended on the relative duration of activity during intermittent contractions.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Farina, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 D-3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark (E-mail: df{at}hst.aau.dk)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Baudry, T. Rudroff, L. A. Pierpoint, and R. M. Enoka
Load Type Influences Motor Unit Recruitment in Biceps Brachii During a Sustained Contraction
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1725 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.