JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 569-579, 2009. First published November 26, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.91068.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/569    most recent
91068.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rabe, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hermsdörfer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rabe, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hermsdörfer, J.

Size–Weight Illusion, Anticipation, and Adaptation of Fingertip Forces in Patients With Cerebellar Degeneration

K. Rabe1, B. Brandauer1,3, Y. Li3, E. R. Gizewski2, D. Timmann1 and J. Hermsdörfer3

1Department of Neurology and 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; and 3Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group, Munich-Bogenhausen Hospital, Munich, Germany

Submitted 23 September 2008; accepted in final form 24 November 2008

The smaller of two equally weighted objects is judged to be heavier when lifted (size–weight illusion [SWI]). In contrast, fingertip forces show an initial size effect but adapt to the true object weights within a few trials. The aim of this study was to investigate possible contributions of the cerebellum to SWI, force anticipation, and adaptation based on object size and weight. Eighteen participants with isolated cerebellar degeneration and 18 age- and gender-matched controls alternately lifted objects of equal weight but different size in 40 trials. All participants perceived the small object to be heavier after lifting (perceptive SWI). Fingertip forces were significantly higher during the first lift of the large object compared with the small object in the control and cerebellar groups. For the load-force rate and lifting acceleration, effects of anticipation were significantly less in the cerebellar compared with the control group. Grip and load forces were adapted to object weight during repeated lifts in both groups. Preserved perceptive SWI in cerebellar patients supports the hypothesis that perceptive SWI depends on the function of the ventral visual path that receives no or few efferents from the cerebellum. The findings of preserved anticipation and adaptation of grip forces in cerebellar patients, however, were unexpected. Reduced anticipation of load forces suggests that the neural presentation of predictive grip- and load-force control may be different. Findings show that representation and adaptation of internal models of object characteristics are not exclusively located in the cerebellum.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Rabe, Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany (E-mail: kasja.rabe{at}uk-essen.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.