HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 101/2/655    most recent 90545.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wei, K. Articles by Körding, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wei, K. Articles by Körding, K.

Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation?

Departments of Physiology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Applied Mathematics, and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 8 May 2008; accepted in final form 12 November 2008

During motor adaptation the nervous system constantly uses error information to improve future movements. Today's mainstream models simply assume that the nervous system adapts linearly and proportionally to errors. However, not all movement errors are relevant to our own action. The environment may transiently disturb the movement production—for example, a gust of wind blows the tennis ball away from its intended trajectory. Apparently the nervous system should not adapt its motor plan in the subsequent tennis strokes based on this irrelevant movement error. We hypothesize that the nervous system estimates the relevance of each observed error and adapts strongly only to relevant errors. Here we present a Bayesian treatment of this problem. The model calculates how likely an error is relevant to the motor plant and derives an ideal adaptation strategy that leads to the most precise movements. This model predicts that adaptation should be a nonlinear function of the size of an error. In reaching experiments we found strong evidence for the predicted nonlinear strategy. The model also explains published data on saccadic gain adaptation, adaptation to visuomotor rotations, and force perturbations. Our study suggests that the nervous system constantly and effortlessly estimates the relevance of observed movement errors for successful motor adaptation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Xu-Wilson, H. Chen-Harris, D. S. Zee, and R. Shadmehr Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Control of Saccades in Humans J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12930 - 12939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Gritsenko, S. Yakovenko, and J. F. Kalaska Integration of Predictive Feedforward and Sensory Feedback Signals for Online Control of Visually Guided Movement J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 914 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. S. Huang and R. Shadmehr Persistence of Motor Memories Reflects Statistics of the Learning Event J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 931 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]