JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 912-916, 2009. First published December 3, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90272.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/912    most recent
90272.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schall, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schall, J. D.

Biophysical Support for Functionally Distinct Cell Types in the Frontal Eye Field

Jeremiah Y. Cohen, Pierre Pouget, Richard P. Heitz, Geoffrey F. Woodman and Jeffrey D. Schall

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

Submitted 15 February 2008; accepted in final form 28 November 2008

Numerous studies have described different functional cell types in the frontal eye field (FEF), but the reliability of the distinction between these types has been uncertain. Studies in other brain areas have described specific differences in the width of action potentials recorded from different cell types. To substantiate the functionally defined cell types encountered in FEF, we measured the width of spikes of visual, movement, and visuomovement types of FEF neurons in macaque monkeys. We show that visuomovement neurons had the thinnest spikes, consistent with a role in local processing. Movement neurons had the widest spikes, consistent with their role in sending eye movement commands to subcortical structures such as the superior colliculus. Visual neurons had wider spikes than visuomovement neurons, consistent with their role in receiving projections from occipital and parietal cortex. These results show how structure and function of FEF can be linked to guide inferences about neuronal architecture.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. D. Schall, 111 21st Ave. South, Nashville, TN 37203 (E-mail: jeffrey.d.schall{at}vanderbilt.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Y. Cohen, R. P. Heitz, J. D. Schall, and G. F. Woodman
On the Origin of Event-Related Potentials Indexing Covert Attentional Selection During Visual Search
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2375 - 2386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Murthy, S. Ray, S. M. Shorter, J. D. Schall, and K. G. Thompson
Neural Control of Visual Search by Frontal Eye Field: Effects of Unexpected Target Displacement on Visual Selection and Saccade Preparation
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2485 - 2506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.