JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 1126-1140, 2009. First published January 7, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00093.2008 Free Article
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1126    most recent
00093.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grün, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grün, S.

INVITED REVIEW

Data-Driven Significance Estimation for Precise Spike Correlation

Sonja Grün

Theoretical Neuroscience Group, Riken Brain Science Institute, Wako-Shi, Japan

Submitted 23 October 2008; accepted in final form 10 December 2008

Abstract

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying neuronal coding and, in particular, the role of temporal spike coordination are hotly debated. However, this debate is often confounded by an implicit discussion about the use of appropriate analysis methods. To avoid incorrect interpretation of data, the analysis of simultaneous spike trains for precise spike correlation needs to be properly adjusted to the features of the experimental spike trains. In particular, nonstationarity of the firing of individual neurons in time or across trials, a spike train structure deviating from Poisson, or a co-occurrence of such features in parallel spike trains are potent generators of false positives. Problems can be avoided by including these features in the null hypothesis of the significance test. In this context, the use of surrogate data becomes increasingly important, because the complexity of the data typically prevents analytical solutions. This review provides an overview of the potential obstacles in the correlation analysis of parallel spike data and possible routes to overcome them. The discussion is illustrated at every stage of the argument by referring to a specific analysis tool (the Unitary Events method). The conclusions, however, are of a general nature and hold for other analysis techniques. Thorough testing and calibration of analysis tools and the impact of potentially erroneous preprocessing stages are emphasized.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Grün, Theoretical Neuroscience Group, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-Shi, 351-0198, Japan (E-mail: gruen{at}brain.riken.jp)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. E. Kilavik, S. Roux, A. Ponce-Alvarez, J. Confais, S. Grun, and A. Riehle
Long-Term Modifications in Motor Cortical Dynamics Induced by Intensive Practice
J. Neurosci., October 7, 2009; 29(40): 12653 - 12663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.