JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 1160-1170, 2009. First published December 17, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90814.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1160    most recent
90814.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Maler, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Maler, L.

Postsynaptic Receptive Field Size and Spike Threshold Determine Encoding of High-Frequency Information Via Sensitivity to Synchronous Presynaptic Activity

Jason W. Middleton1,2, André Longtin1,2,3, Jan Benda4 and Leonard Maler1,2

1Departments of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 3Physics and 2Centre for Neural Dynamics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and 4Institute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Submitted 25 July 2008; accepted in final form 11 December 2008

Abstract

Parallel sensory streams carrying distinct information about various stimulus properties have been observed in several sensory systems, including the visual system. What remains unclear is why some of these streams differ in the size of their receptive fields (RFs). In the electrosensory system, neurons with large RFs have short-latency responses and are tuned to high-frequency inputs. Conversely, neurons with small RFs are low-frequency tuned and exhibit longer-latency responses. What principle underlies this organization? We show experimentally that synchronous electroreceptor afferent (P-unit) spike trains selectively encode high-frequency stimulus information from broadband signals. This finding relies on a comparison of stimulus-spike output coherence using output trains obtained by either summing pairs of recorded afferent spike trains or selecting synchronous spike trains based on coincidence within a small time window. We propose a physiologically realistic decoding mechanism, based on postsynaptic RF size and postsynaptic output rate normalization that tunes target pyramidal cells in different electrosensory maps to low- or high-frequency signal components. By driving realistic neuron models with experimentally obtained P-unit spike trains, we show that a small RF is matched with a postsynaptic integration regime leading to responses over a broad range of frequencies, and a large RF with a fluctuation-driven regime that requires synchronous presynaptic input and therefore selectively encodes higher frequencies, confirming recent experimental data. Thus our work reveals that the frequency content of a broadband stimulus extracted by pyramidal cells, from P-unit afferents, depends on the amount of feedforward convergence they receive.


Present address and address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. W. Middleton, Dept. of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St., BST E1407, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (E-mail: jmiddlet{at}pitt.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Marsat, R. D. Proville, and L. Maler
Transient Signals Trigger Synchronous Bursts in an Identified Population of Neurons
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 714 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.