HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figures and Tables All Versions of this Article: 101/3/1394    most recent 90925.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lilaonitkul, W. Articles by Guinan, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lilaonitkul, W. Articles by Guinan, J. J., Jr.

Reflex Control of the Human Inner Ear: A Half-Octave Offset in Medial Efferent Feedback That Is Consistent With an Efferent Role in the Control of Masking

¹Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge; ²Eaton Peabody Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston; ³Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston; and ⁴Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts

Submitted 16 August 2008; accepted in final form 29 December 2008

Abstract

The high sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the mammalian cochlea is due to amplification produced by outer hair cells (OHCs) and controlled by medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents. Data from animals led to the view that MOC fibers provide frequency-specific inhibitory feedback; however, these studies did not measure intact MOC reflexes. To test whether MOC inhibition is primarily at the frequency that elicits the MOC activity, acoustically elicited MOC effects were quantified in humans by the change in otoacoustic emissions produced by 60-dB SPL tone and half-octave-band noise elicitors at different frequencies relative to a 40-dB SPL, 1-kHz probe tone. On average, all elicitors produced MOC effects that were skewed (elicitor frequencies -1 octave below the probe produced larger effects than those -1 octave above). The largest MOC effects were from elicitors below the probe frequency for contra- and bilateral elicitors but were from elicitors centered at the probe frequency for ipsilateral elicitors. Typically, ipsilateral elicitors produced larger effects than contralateral elicitors and bilateral elicitors produced effects near the ipsi+contra sum. Elicitors at levels down to 30-dB SPL produced similar patterns. Tuning curves (TCs) interpolated from these data were V-shaped with Q10s 2. These are sharper than MOC-fiber TCs found near 1 kHz in cats and guinea pigs. Because cochlear amplification is skewed (more below the best frequency of a cochlear region), these data are consistent with an anti-masking role of MOC efferents that reduces masking by reducing the cochlear amplification seen at 1 kHz.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Abel, A. Wittekindt, and M. Kossl Contralateral Acoustic Stimulation Modulates Low-Frequency Biasing of DPOAE: Efferent Influence on Cochlear Amplifier Operating State? J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2362 - 2371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]