HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figures All Versions of this Article: 101/3/1575    most recent 91106.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berke, J. D. Articles by Eichenbaum, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berke, J. D. Articles by Eichenbaum, H.

Striatal Versus Hippocampal Representations During Win-Stay Maze Performance

¹Department of Psychology, ²Program in Neuroscience, and ³Program in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and ⁴Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

Submitted 3 October 2008; accepted in final form 7 January 2009

Abstract

The striatum and hippocampus are widely held to be components of distinct memory systems that can guide competing behavioral strategies. However, some electrophysiological studies have suggested that neurons in both structures encode spatial information and may therefore make similar contributions to behavior. In rats well trained to perform a win-stay radial maze task, we recorded simultaneously from dorsal hippocampus and from multiple striatal subregions, including both lateral areas implicated in motor responses to cues and medial areas that work cooperatively with hippocampus in cognitive operations. In each brain region, movement through the maze was accompanied by the continuous sequential activation of sets of projection neurons. Hippocampal neurons overwhelmingly were active at a single spatial location (place cells). Striatal projection neurons were active at discrete points within the progression of every trial—especially during choices or following reward delivery—regardless of spatial position. Place-cell–type firing was not observed even for medial striatal cells entrained to the hippocampal theta rhythm. We also examined neural coding in earlier training sessions, when rats made use of spatial working memory to guide choices, and again found that striatal cells did not show place-cell–type firing. Prospective or retrospective encoding of trajectory was not observed in either hippocampus or striatum, at either training stage. Our results indicate that, at least in this task, dorsal hippocampus uses a spatial foundation for information processing that is not substantially modulated by spatial working memory demands. By contrast, striatal cells do not use such a spatial foundation, even in medial subregions that cooperate with hippocampus in the selection of spatial strategies. The progressive dominance of a striatum-dependent strategy does not appear to be accompanied by large changes in striatal or hippocampal single-cell representations, suggesting that the conflict between strategies may be resolved elsewhere.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. A. Pennartz, J. D. Berke, A. M. Graybiel, R. Ito, C. S. Lansink, M. van der Meer, A. D. Redish, K. S. Smith, and P. Voorn Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12831 - 12838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Kubota, J. Liu, D. Hu, W. E. DeCoteau, U. T. Eden, A. C. Smith, and A. M. Graybiel Stable Encoding of Task Structure Coexists With Flexible Coding of Task Events in Sensorimotor Striatum J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2142 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]