JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 1598-1612, 2009. First published January 7, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91168.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1598    most recent
91168.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geran, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Travers, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geran, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Travers, S. P.

Bitter-Responsive Gustatory Neurons in the Rat Parabrachial Nucleus

Laura C. Geran and Susan P. Travers

College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Submitted 24 October 2008; accepted in final form 31 December 2008

Abstract

Bitterness is a distinctive taste sensation, but central coding for this quality remains enigmatic. Although some receptor cells and peripheral fibers are selectively responsive to bitter ligands, central bitter responses are most typical in broadly tuned neurons. Recently we reported more specifically tuned bitter-best cells (B-best) in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). Most had glossopharyngeal receptive fields and few projected to the parabrachial nucleus (PBN), suggesting a role in reflexes. To determine their potential contribution to other functions, the present study investigated whether B-best neurons occur further centrally. Responses from 90 PBN neurons were recorded from anesthetized rats. Stimulation with four bitter tastants (quinine, denatonium, propylthiouracil, cycloheximide) and sweet, umami, salty, and sour ligands revealed a substantial proportion of B-best cells (22%). Receptive fields for B-best NST neurons were overwhelmingly foliate in origin, but in PBN, about half received foliate and nasoincisor duct input. Despite convergence, most B-best PBN neurons were as selectively tuned as their medullary counterparts and response profiles were reliable. Regardless of intensity, cycloheximide did not activate broadly tuned acid/sodium (AN) neurons but did elicit robust responses in B-best cells. However, stronger quinine activated AN neurons and concentrated electrolytes stimulated B-best cells, suggesting that B-best neurons might contribute to higher-order functions such as taste quality coding but work in conjunction with other cell types to unambiguously signal bitter-tasting ligands. In this ensemble, B-best neurons would help discriminate sour from bitter stimuli, whereas AN neurons might be more important in differentiating ionic from nonionic bitter stimuli.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. P. Travers, 305 W. 12th Ave. Postle Hall, Oral Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.