JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 2017-2029, 2009. First published February 11, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.90931.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/2017    most recent
90931.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, R. V.

Responses of Neurons in Chinchilla Auditory Cortex to Frequency-Modulated Tones

Trecia A. Brown1,3 and Robert V. Harrison1,2,3

1Departments of Physiology and 2Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto; and 3Auditory Science Laboratory, Neurosciences and Mental Health Division, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 18 August 2008; accepted in final form 9 February 2009

Frequency-modulated (FM) stimuli have been used to explore the behavior of neurons in the auditory cortex of several animal models; however, the properties of FM-sensitive auditory cortical neurons in the chinchilla are still unknown. Single-unit responses to FM stimulation were obtained from the auditory cortex of anesthetized adult chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger). Upward and downward linear FM sweeps spanning frequencies from 0.1 to 20 kHz were presented at speeds of 0.05 to 0.82 kHz/ms. Results indicated that >90% of sampled neurons were responsive to FM sweeps. The population preference was for upward FM sweeps and for medium to fast speeds (≥0.3 kHz/ms). Few units (3%) were selective for downward FM sweeps, whereas <22% of units preferred slow speeds (≤0.1 kHz/ms). Velocity preference and direction sensitivity were positively correlated for upward sweeps only (r = 0.40, P = 0.0021, t-test). Three types of firing rate patterns were observed in the FM response peristimulus time histograms: a single peak at sweep onset/offset ("onset") and a single peak ("late") or multiple peaks ("burst") during the sweep. "Late" units expressed the highest mean values for direction sensitivity and speed selectivity; "onset" units were selective only for direction and "burst" units were not selective for either direction or speed. The robust responsiveness of these neurons to FM sweeps suggests a functional role for FM detection such as the identification of FM sweeps present in vocalizations of other organisms within the chinchilla's natural environment.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Brown, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 3005, McMaster Building, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8 (E-mail: trecia.brown{at}utoronto.ca)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.