HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 101/4/2166    most recent 91088.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yeh, C.-I Articles by Alonso, J.-M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yeh, C.-I Articles by Alonso, J.-M.

Functional Consequences of Neuronal Divergence Within the Retinogeniculate Pathway

¹Department of Biological Sciences, State College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, New York; and ²Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut

Submitted 29 September 2008; accepted in final form 23 January 2009

The neuronal connections from the retina to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) are characterized by a high specificity. Each retinal ganglion cell diverges to connect to a small group of geniculate cells and each geniculate cell receives input from a small number of retinal ganglion cells. Consistent with the high specificity of the connections, geniculate cells sharing input from the same retinal afferent are thought to have very similar receptive fields. However, the magnitude of the receptive-field mismatches, which has not been systematically measured across the different cell types in dLGN, seems to be in contradiction with the functional anatomy of the Y visual pathway: Y retinal afferents in the cat diverge into two geniculate layers (A and C) that have Y geniculate cells (Y_A and Y_C) with different receptive-field sizes, response latencies, nonlinearity of spatial summation, and contrast sensitivity. To better understand the functional consequences of retinogeniculate divergence, we recorded from pairs of geniculate cells that shared input from a common retinal afferent across layers and within the same layer in dLGN. We found that nearly all cell pairs that shared retinal input across layers had Y-type receptive fields of the same sign (i.e., both on-center) that overlapped by >70%, but frequently differed in size and response latency. The receptive-field mismatches were relatively small in value (receptive-field size ratio <5; difference in peak response <5 ms), but were robustly correlated with the strength of the synchronous firing generated by the shared retinal connections (R² = 0.75). On average, the percentage of geniculate spikes that could be attributed to shared retinal inputs was about 10% for all cell-pair combinations studied. These results are used to provide new estimates of retinogeniculate divergence for different cell classes.