HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 101/5/2348    most recent 91196.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vonderschen, K. Articles by Wagner, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vonderschen, K. Articles by Wagner, H.

Tuning to Interaural Time Difference and Frequency Differs Between the Auditory Arcopallium and the External Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus

Institute of Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Submitted 10 November 2008; accepted in final form 2 March 2009

Barn owls process sound-localization information in two parallel pathways, the midbrain and the forebrain pathway. Exctracellular recordings of neural responses to auditory stimuli from far advanced stations of these pathways, the auditory arcopallium in the forebrain and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain, demonstrated that the representations of interaural time difference and frequency in the forebrain pathway differ from those in the midbrain pathway. Specifically, low-frequency representation was conserved in the forebrain pathway, while it was lost in the midbrain pathway. Variation of interaural time difference yielded symmetrical tuning curves in the midbrain pathway. By contrast, the typical forebrain-tuning curve was asymmetric with a steep slope crossing zero time difference and a less-steep slope toward larger contralateral time disparities. Low sound frequencies contributed sensitivity to contralateral leading sounds underlying these asymmetries, whereas high frequencies enhanced the steepness of slopes at small interaural time differences. Furthermore, the peaks of time-disparity tuning curves were wider in the forebrain than in the midbrain. The distribution of the steepest slopes of best interaural time differences in the auditory arcopallium, but not in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus, was centered at zero time difference. The distribution observed in the auditory arocpallium is reminiscent of the situation observed in small mammals. We speculate that the forebrain representation may serve as a population code supporting fine discrimination of central interaural time differences and coarse indication of laterality of a stimulus for large interaural time differences.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Perez, S. J. Shanbhag, and J. L. Pena Auditory Spatial Tuning at the Crossroads of the Midbrain and Forebrain J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1472 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Reches and Y. Gutfreund Auditory and Multisensory Responses in the Tectofugal Pathway of the Barn Owl J. Neurosci., July 29, 2009; 29(30): 9602 - 9613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]