JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 2380-2394, 2009. First published March 4, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91193.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2380    most recent
91193.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zahar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gutfreund, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zahar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gutfreund, Y.

Multisensory Enhancement in the Optic Tectum of the Barn Owl: Spike Count and Spike Timing

Yael Zahar, Amit Reches and Yoram Gutfreund

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion, Haifa, Israel

Submitted 9 November 2008; accepted in final form 2 March 2009

Temporal and spatial correlations between auditory and visual stimuli facilitate the perception of unitary events and improve behavioral responses. However, it is not clear how combined visual and auditory information is processed in single neurons. Here we studied responses of multisensory neurons in the barn owl's optic tectum (the avian homologue of the superior colliculus) to visual, auditory, and bimodal stimuli. We specifically focused on responses to sequences of repeated stimuli. We first report that bimodal stimulation tends to elicit more spikes than in the responses to its unimodal components (a phenomenon known as multisensory enhancement). However, this tendency was found to be history-dependent; multisensory enhancement was mostly apparent in the first stimulus of the sequence and to a much lesser extent in the subsequent stimuli. Next, a vector-strength analysis was applied to quantify the phase locking of the responses to the stimuli. We report that in a substantial number of multisensory neurons responses to sequences of bimodal stimuli elicited spike trains that were better phase locked to the stimulus than spike trains elicited by stimulating with the unimodal counterparts (visual or auditory). We conclude that multisensory enhancement can be manifested in better phase locking to the stimulus as well as in more spikes.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. Gutfreund, Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, The Bruce Rappaport Medical School, The Technion, Haifa, 31096, Israel (E-mail: yoramg{at}tx.technion.ac.il)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Reches and Y. Gutfreund
Auditory and Multisensory Responses in the Tectofugal Pathway of the Barn Owl
J. Neurosci., July 29, 2009; 29(30): 9602 - 9613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.