JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 2620-2631, 2009. First published March 4, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.90291.2008 Free Article
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2620    most recent
90291.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Friston, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Friston, K. J.

Dynamic Causal Modeling of the Response to Frequency Deviants

Marta I. Garrido, James M. Kilner, Stefan J. Kiebel and Karl J. Friston

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Submitted 21 February 2008; accepted in final form 24 February 2009

This article describes the use of dynamic causal modeling to test hypotheses about the genesis of evoked responses. Specifically, we consider the mismatch negativity (MMN), a well-characterized response to deviant sounds and one of the most widely studied evoked responses. There have been several mechanistic accounts of how the MMN might arise. It has been suggested that the MMN results from a comparison between sensory input and a memory trace of previous input, although others have argued that local adaptation, due to stimulus repetition, is sufficient to explain the MMN. Thus the precise mechanisms underlying the generation of the MMN remain unclear. This study tests some biologically plausible spatiotemporal dipole models that rest on changes in extrinsic top-down connections (that enable comparison) and intrinsic changes (that model adaptation). Dynamic causal modeling suggested that responses to deviants are best explained by changes in effective connectivity both within and between cortical sources in a hierarchical network of distributed sources. Our model comparison suggests that both adaptation and memory comparison operate in concert to produce the early (N1 enhancement) and late (MMN) parts of the response to frequency deviants. We consider these mechanisms in the light of predictive coding and hierarchical inference in the brain.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. I. Garrido, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, 12 Queen Square, London, UK WC1N 3BG (E-mail: m.garrido{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.