JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 2907-2923, 2009. First published March 18, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91045.2008 Free Article
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/2907    most recent
91045.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dean, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dean, P.

Dynamics of Primate Oculomotor Plant Revealed by Effects of Abducens Microstimulation

Sean R. Anderson1, John Porrill1, Sokratis Sklavos1,2, Neeraj J. Gandhi3, David L. Sparks4 and Paul Dean1

1Department of Psychology, Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom; 2Department of Physiology, School of Nursing, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 3Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and 4Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Submitted 17 September 2008; accepted in final form 12 March 2009

Despite their importance for deciphering oculomotor commands, the mechanics of the extraocular muscles and orbital tissues (oculomotor plant) are poorly understood. In particular, the significance of plant nonlinearities is uncertain. Here primate plant dynamics were investigated by measuring the eye movements produced by stimulating the abducens nucleus with brief pulse trains of varying frequency. Statistical analysis of these movements indicated that the effects of stimulation lasted about 40 ms after the final pulse, after which the eye returned passively toward its position before stimulation. Behavior during the passive phase could be approximated by a linear plant model, corresponding to Voigt elements in series, with properties independent of initial eye position. In contrast, behavior during the stimulation phase revealed a sigmoidal relation between stimulation frequency and estimated steady-state tetanic tension, together with a frequency-dependent rate of tension increase, that appeared very similar to the nonlinearities previously found for isometric-force production in primate lateral rectus muscle. These results suggest that the dynamics of the oculomotor plant have an approximately linear component related to steady-state viscoelasticity and a nonlinear component related to changes in muscle activation. The latter may in part account for the nonlinear relations observed between eye-movement parameters and single-unit firing patterns in the abducens nucleus. These findings point to the importance of recruitment as a simplifying factor for motor control with nonlinear plants.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Dean, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK (E-mail: p.dean{at}sheffield.ac.uk)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.