JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 2934-2942, 2009. First published March 25, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00053.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/2934    most recent
00053.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berman, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wurtz, R. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berman, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wurtz, R. H.

Modulation of Presaccadic Activity in the Frontal Eye Field by the Superior Colliculus

Rebecca A. Berman, Wilsaan M. Joiner, James Cavanaugh and Robert H. Wurtz

Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Submitted 16 January 2009; accepted in final form 21 March 2009

A cascade of neuronal signals precedes each saccadic eye movement to targets in the visual scene. In the cerebral cortex, this neuronal processing culminates in the frontal eye field (FEF), where neurons have bursts of activity before the saccade. This presaccadic activity is typically considered to drive downstream activity in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC), which receives direct projections from FEF. Consequently, the FEF activity is thought to be determined solely by earlier cortical processing and unaffected by activity in the SC. Recent evidence of an ascending path from the SC to FEF raises the possibility, however, that presaccadic activity in the FEF may also depend on input from the SC. Here we tested this possibility by recording from single FEF neurons during the reversible inactivation of SC. Our results indicate that presaccadic activity in the FEF does not require SC input: we never observed a significant reduction in FEF presaccadic activity when the SC was inactivated. Unexpectedly, in a third of experiments, SC inactivation elicited a significant increase in FEF presaccadic activity. The passive visual response of FEF neurons, in contrast, was virtually unaffected by inactivation of the SC. These findings show that presaccadic activity in the FEF does not originate in the SC but nevertheless may be influenced by modulatory signals ascending from the SC.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. A. Berman, Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Building 49, Room 2A50, 49 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD 20982-4435 (E-mail: bermanr{at}nei.nih.gov)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.