JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 3053-3062, 2009. First published March 25, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91194.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/3053    most recent
91194.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beurze, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Medendorp, W. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beurze, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Medendorp, W. P.

Spatial and Effector Processing in the Human Parietofrontal Network for Reaches and Saccades

S. M. Beurze, F. P. de Lange, I. Toni and W. P. Medendorp

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Submitted 10 November 2008; accepted in final form 23 March 2009

It is generally accepted that interactions between parietal and frontal cortices subserve the visuomotor processing for eye and hand movements. Here, we used a sequential-instruction paradigm in 3-T functional MRI to test the processing of effector and spatial signals, as well as their interaction, as a movement is composed and executed in different stages. Subjects prepared either a saccade or a reach following two successive visual instruction cues, presented in either order. One cue instructed which effector to use (eyes, right hand); the other signaled the spatial goal (leftward vs. rightward target location) of the movement. During the first phase of the prepared movement, after cueing of either goal or effector information, we found significant spatial goal selectivity but no effector specificity along the parietofrontal network. During the second phase of the prepared movement, when both goal and effector information were available, we found a large overlap in the neural circuitry involved in the planning of eye and hand movements. Gradually distributed along this network, we observed clear spatial goal selectivity and limited, but significant, effector specificity. Regions in the intraparietal sulcus and the dorsal premotor cortex were selective to both goal location and motor effector. Taken together, our results suggest that the relative weight of spatial goal and effector selectivity changes along the parietofrontal network, depending on the status of the movement plan.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. P. Medendorp, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, NL-6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (E-mail: p.medendorp{at}donders.ru.nl)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. M. Lawrence and L. H. Snyder
The Responses of Visual Neurons in the Frontal Eye Field Are Biased for Saccades
J. Neurosci., November 4, 2009; 29(44): 13815 - 13822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.