JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 3212-3225, 2009. First published April 8, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91333.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/3212    most recent
91333.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itatani, N.
Right arrow Articles by Klump, G. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itatani, N.
Right arrow Articles by Klump, G. M.

Auditory Streaming of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds in the Songbird Forebrain

Naoya Itatani and Georg M. Klump

Animal Physiology and Behaviour Group, Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University-Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Submitted 18 December 2008; accepted in final form 31 March 2009

Streaming in auditory scene analysis refers to the perceptual grouping of multiple interleaved sounds having similar characteristics while sounds with different characteristics are segregated. In human perception, auditory streaming occurs on the basis of temporal features of sounds such as the rate of amplitude modulation. We present results from multiunit recordings in the auditory forebrain of awake European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) on the representation of sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones to investigate the effect of temporal envelope structure on neural stream segregation. Different types of rate modulation transfer functions in response to SAM tones were observed. The strongest responses were found for modulation frequencies (fmod) <160 Hz. The streaming stimulus consisted of sequences of alternating SAM tones with the same carrier frequency but differing in fmod (ABA-ABA-ABA-...). A signals had a modulation frequency evoking a large excitation, whereas the fmod of B signals was ≤4 octaves higher. Synchrony of B signal responses to the modulation decreased as fmod increased. Spike rate in response to B signals dropped as fmod increased. Faster signal repetition resulted in fewer spikes, suggesting the contribution of forward suppression to the response that may be due to both signals having similar spectral energy and that is not related to the temporal pattern of modulation. These two effects are additive and may provide the basis for a more separated representation of A and B signals by two populations of neurons that can be viewed as a neuronal correlate of segregated streams.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Itatani, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Fakultät V, Institut für Biologie und Umweltwissenschaften, AG Zoophysiologie und Verhalten, Carl von Ossietzky Str. 9-11, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany (E-mail: naoya.itatani{at}uni-oldenburg.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.