JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 3226-3234, 2009. First published April 8, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91349.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/3226    most recent
91349.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gidon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Segev, I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gidon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Segev, I.

Spike-Timing–Dependent Synaptic Plasticity and Synaptic Democracy in Dendrites

Albert Gidon1 and Idan Segev1,2

1Department of Neurobiology and 2Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Submitted 22 December 2008; accepted in final form 6 April 2009

We explored in a computational study the effect of dendrites on excitatory synapses undergoing spike-timing–dependent plasticity (STDP), using both cylindrical dendritic models and reconstructed dendritic trees. We show that even if the initial strength, gpeak, of distal synapses is augmented in a location independent manner, the efficacy of distal synapses diminishes following STDP and proximal synapses would eventually dominate. Indeed, proximal synapses always win over distal synapses following linear STDP rule, independent of the initial synaptic strength distribution in the dendritic tree. This effect is more pronounced as the dendritic cable length increases but it does not depend on the dendritic branching structure. Adding a small multiplicative component to the linear STDP rule, whereby already strong synapses tend to be less potentiated than depressed (and vice versa for weak synapses) did partially "save" distal synapses from "dying out." Another successful strategy for balancing the efficacy of distal and proximal synapses following STDP is to increase the upper bound for the synaptic conductance (gmax) with distance from the soma. We conclude by discussing an experiment for assessing which of these possible strategies might actually operate in dendrites.


Address for correspondence: A. Gidon, The Hebrew Univ., Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram Jerusalem 91904, Israel (E-mail: agidon20{at}lobster.ls.huji.ac.il)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.