JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 101: 3310-3324, 2009. First published April 8, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91306.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/3310    most recent
91306.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drucker, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aguirre, G. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drucker, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aguirre, G. K.

INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY

Distinguishing Conjoint and Independent Neural Tuning for Stimulus Features With fMRI Adaptation

Daniel M. Drucker1, Wesley Thomas Kerr2 and Geoffrey Karl Aguirre2

Departments of 1Psychology and 2Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 10 December 2008; accepted in final form 6 April 2009

A central focus of cognitive neuroscience is identification of the neural codes that represent stimulus dimensions. One common theme is the study of whether dimensions, such as color and shape, are encoded independently by separate pools of neurons or are represented by neurons conjointly tuned for both properties. We describe an application of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) adaptation to distinguish between independent and conjoint neural representations of dimensions by examining the neural signal evoked by changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions and considering the metric of two-dimension additivity. We describe how a continuous carry-over paradigm may be used to efficiently estimate this metric. The assumptions of the method are examined as are optimizations. Finally, we demonstrate that the method produces the expected result for fMRI data collected from ventral occipitotemporal cortex while subjects viewed sets of shapes predicted to be represented by conjoint or independent neural tuning.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. K. Aguirre, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3 West Gates, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (E-mail: aguirreg{at}mail.med.upenn.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.