JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 110-118, 2009. First published April 15, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91320.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/110    most recent
91320.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavassoli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ringach, D. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavassoli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ringach, D. L.

Dynamics of Smooth Pursuit Maintenance

Abtine Tavassoli and Dario L. Ringach

Departments of Neurobiology and Psychology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Submitted 15 December 2008; accepted in final form 10 April 2009

Smooth pursuit eye movements allow the approximate stabilization of a moving visual target on the retina. To study the dynamics of smooth pursuit, we measured eye velocity during the visual tracking of a Gabor target moving at a constant velocity plus a noisy perturbation term. The optimal linear filter linking fluctuations in target velocity to evoked fluctuations in eye velocity was computed. These filters predicted eye velocity to novel stimuli in the 0- to 15-Hz band with good accuracy, showing that pursuit maintenance is approximately linear under these conditions. The shape of the filters were indicative of fast dynamics, with pure delays of merely ~67 ms, times-to-peak of ~115 ms, and effective integration times of ~45 ms. The gain of the system, reflected in the amplitude of the filters, was inversely proportional to the size of the velocity fluctuations and independent of the target mean speed. A modest slow-down of the dynamics was observed as the contrast of the target decreased. Finally, the temporal filters recovered during fixation and pursuit were similar in shape, supporting the notion that they might share a common underlying circuitry. These findings show that the visual tracking of moving objects by the human eye includes a reflexive-like pathway with high contrast sensitivity and fast dynamics.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. L. Ringach, Dept. of Neurobiology and Psychology, Jules Stein Eye Inst., David Geffen School of Medicine, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (E-mail: dario{at}ucla.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. C. Osborne and S. G. Lisberger
Spatial and Temporal Integration of Visual Motion Signals for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2013 - 2025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.