HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Tables All Versions of this Article: 102/1/302    most recent 91090.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Wenderoth, N. Articles by Swinnen, S. P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wenderoth, N. Articles by Swinnen, S. P.

Conceptual Binding: Integrated Visual Cues Reduce Processing Costs in Bimanual Movements

¹Motor Control Lab, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and ²Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science and ³Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Submitted 30 September 2008; accepted in final form 13 April 2009

In discrete reaction time (RT) tasks, it has been shown that nonsymmetric bimanual movements are initiated slower than symmetric movements in response to symbolic cues. By contrast, no such RT differences are found in response to direct cues ("direct cue effect"). Here, we report three experiments showing that the direct cue effect generalizes to rhythmical bimanual movements and that RT cost depends on different cue features: 1) symbolic versus direct or 2) integrated (i.e., action of both hands is indicated as one entity) versus dissociated (i.e., action of each hand is indicated separately). Our main finding was that dissociated symbolic cues were most likely processed serially, resulting in the longest RTs, which were substantially reduced with integrated symbolic cues. However, extra RT costs for switching to nonsymmetrical bimanual movements were overcome only when the integrated cues were direct. We conclude that computational resources might have been exceeded when the response needs to be determined for each hand separately, but not when a common response for both hands is selected. This supports the idea that bimanual control benefits from conceptual binding.