JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 437-450, 2009. First published April 29, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00277.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/437    most recent
00277.2009v2
00277.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirata, A.
Right arrow Articles by Castro-Alamancos, M. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirata, A.
Right arrow Articles by Castro-Alamancos, M. A.

Influence of Subcortical Inhibition on Barrel Cortex Receptive Fields

Akio Hirata, Juan Aguilar and Manuel A. Castro-Alamancos

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 30 March 2009; accepted in final form 21 April 2009

Influence of subcortical inhibition on barrel cortex receptive fields. By the time neural responses driven by vibrissa stimuli reach the barrel cortex, they have undergone significant spatial and temporal transformations within subcortical relays. A major regulator of these transformations is thought to be subcortical GABA-mediated inhibition, but the actual degree of this influence is unknown. We used disinhibition produced by GABA receptor antagonists to unmask the excitatory sensory responses that are normally suppressed by inhibition in the main subcortical sensory relays to barrel cortex; principal trigeminal (Pr5) and primary thalamic (VPM) nuclei. We found that, within subcortical relays, inhibition only slightly suppresses short-latency receptive field responses, but robustly suppresses long-latency center and surround receptive field responses. However, the long-latency subcortical effects of inhibition are mostly not reflected in the barrel cortex. The most robust effect of subcortical inhibition on barrel cortex responses is to transiently suppress the receptive field responses of high-frequency sensory stimuli. This transient adaptation caused by subcortical inhibition recovers within a few stimuli and gives way to a steady-state adaptation that is independent of subcortical inhibition.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Castro-Alamancos, Depart. of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Ln., Philadelphia, PA 19129 (E-mail: mcastro{at}drexelmed.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.