JN Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1004-1016, 2009. First published June 10, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00040.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1004    most recent
00040.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wenstrup, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wenstrup, J.

Glycinergic Inhibition Creates a Form of Auditory Spectral Integration in Nuclei of the Lateral Lemniscus

Diana Coomes Peterson, Kiran Nataraj and Jeffrey Wenstrup

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio

Submitted 14 January 2009; accepted in final form 2 June 2009

For analyses of complex sounds, many neurons integrate information across different spectral elements via suppressive effects that are distant from the neurons' excitatory tuning. In the mustached bat, suppression evoked by sounds within the first sonar harmonic (23–30 kHz) or in the subsonar band (<23 kHz) alters responsiveness to the higher best frequencies of many neurons. This study examined features and mechanisms associated with low-frequency (LF) suppression among neurons of the lateral lemniscal nuclei (NLL). We obtained extracellular recordings from neurons in the intermediate and ventral nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, observing different forms of LF suppression related to the two above-cited frequency bands. To understand the mechanisms underlying this suppression in NLL neurons, we examined the roles of glycinergic and GABAergic input through local microiontophoretic application of strychnine, an antagonist to glycine receptors (GlyRs), or bicuculline, an antagonist to {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs). With blockade of GABAARs, neurons showed an increase in firing rate to best frequency (BF) and/or LF tones but retained LF suppression of BF sounds. For neurons that displayed LF suppression tuned to 23–30 kHz, the suppression was eliminated or nearly eliminated by GlyR blockade. In contrast, GABAAR blockade did not eliminate nor had any consistent effect on suppression tuned to these frequencies. We conclude that LF suppression tuned in the 23- to 30-kHz range results from neuronal inhibition within the NLL via glycinergic inputs. For neurons displaying suppression tuned <23 kHz, neither GlyR nor GABAR blockade altered LF suppression. We conclude that such suppression originates at a lower auditory level, perhaps a result of cochlear mechanisms. These findings demonstrate that neuronal interactions within NLL create a particular form of LF suppression that contributes to the analysis of complex acoustic signals.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Wenstrup, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, 4209 State Route 44, PO Box 95, Rootstown, OH 44272 (E-mail: jjw{at}neoucom.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.