JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1254-1264, 2009. First published June 24, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00346.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures and Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1254    most recent
00346.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chisari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mennerick, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chisari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mennerick, S.

The Influence of Neuroactive Steroid Lipophilicity on GABAA Receptor Modulation: Evidence for a Low-Affinity Interaction

Mariangela Chisari1, Lawrence N. Eisenman3, Kathiresan Krishnan2, Achintya K. Bandyopadhyaya2, Cunde Wang2, Amanda Taylor1, Ann Benz1, Douglas F. Covey2, Charles F. Zorumski1,4 and Steven Mennerick1,4

1Departments of Psychiatry, 2Developmental Biology, 3Neurology, and 4Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 17 April 2009; accepted in final form 16 June 2009

Anesthetic steroids with actions at {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs) may access transmembrane domain binding site(s) directly from the plasma cell membrane. Accordingly, the effective concentration in lipid phase and the ability of the steroid to meet pharmacophore requirements for activity will both contribute to observed steady-state potency. Furthermore, onset and offset of receptor effects may be rate limited by lipid partitioning. Here we show that several GABA-active steroids, including naturally occurring neurosteroids, of different lipophilicity differ in kinetics and potency at GABAARs. The hydrophobicity ranking predicted relative potency of GABAAR potentiation and predicted current offset kinetics. Kinetic offset differences among steroids were largely eliminated by {gamma}-cyclodextrin, a scavenger of unbound steroid, suggesting that affinity differences among the analogues are dwarfed by the contributions of nonspecific accumulation. A 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD)–tagged fluorescent analogue of the low-lipophilicity alphaxalone (C17-NBD-alphaxalone) exhibited faster nonspecific accumulation and departitioning than those of a fluorescent analogue of the high-lipophilicity (3{alpha},5{alpha})-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one (C17-NBD-3{alpha}5{alpha}A). These differences were paralleled by differences in potentiation of GABAAR function. The enantiomer of C17-NBD-3{alpha}5{alpha}A, which does not satisfy pharmacophore requirements for steroid potentiation, exhibited identical fluorescence kinetics and distribution to C17-NBD-3{alpha}5{alpha}A, but was inactive at GABAARs. Simple simulations supported our major findings, which suggest that neurosteroid binding affinity is low. Therefore both specific (e.g., fulfilling pharmacophore requirements) and nonspecific (e.g., lipid solubility) properties contribute to the potency and longevity of anesthetic steroid action.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Mennerick, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8134, St. Louis, MO 63110 (E-mail: menneris{at}psychiatry.wustl.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.