JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1296-1309, 2009. First published May 27, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.90996.2008 Free Article
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1296    most recent
90996.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S. N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S. N.

Coherence Between Motor Cortical Activity and Peripheral Discontinuities During Slow Finger Movements

Elizabeth R. Williams, Demetris S. Soteropoulos and Stuart N. Baker

Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Submitted 3 September 2008; accepted in final form 26 May 2009

Slow finger movements in man are not smooth, but are characterized by 8- to 12-Hz discontinuities in finger acceleration thought to have a central source. We trained two macaque monkeys to track a moving target by performing index finger flexion/extension movements and recorded local field potentials (LFPs) and spike activity from the primary motor cortex (M1); some cells were identified as pyramidal tract neurons by antidromic activation or as corticomotoneuronal cells by spike-triggered averaging. There was significant coherence between finger acceleration in the approximately 10-Hz range and both LFPs and spikes. LFP–acceleration coherence was similar for flexion and extension movements (0.094 at 9.8 Hz and 0.11 at 6.8 Hz, respectively), but substantially smaller during steady holding (0.0067 at 9.35 Hz). The coherence phase showed a significant linear relationship with frequency over the 6- to 13-Hz range, as expected for a constant conduction delay, but the slope indicated that LFP lagged acceleration by 18 ± 14 or 36 ± 8 ms for flexion and extension movements, respectively. Directed coherence analysis supported the conclusion that the dominant interaction was in the acceleration to LFP (i.e., sensory) direction. The phase relationships between finger acceleration and both LFPs and spikes shifted by about {pi} radians in flexion compared with extension trials. However, for a given trial type the phase relationship with acceleration was similar for cells that increased their firing during flexion or during extension trials. We conclude that movement discontinuities during slow finger movements arise from a reciprocally coupled network, which includes M1 and the periphery.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Baker, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK (E-mail: stuart.baker{at}ncl.ac.uk)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.