JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1331-1339, 2009. First published June 17, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.90920.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1331    most recent
90920.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickey, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hatsopoulos, N. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dickey, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hatsopoulos, N. G.

INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY

Single-Unit Stability Using Chronically Implanted Multielectrode Arrays

Adam S. Dickey1, Aaron Suminski2, Yali Amit1,3 and Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos1,2

1Committee on Computational Neuroscience, 2Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, and 3Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 15 August 2008; accepted in final form 15 June 2009

The use of chronic intracortical multielectrode arrays has become increasingly prevalent in neurophysiological experiments. However, it is not obvious whether neuronal signals obtained over multiple recording sessions come from the same or different neurons. Here, we develop a criterion to assess single-unit stability by measuring the similarity of 1) average spike waveforms and 2) interspike interval histograms (ISIHs). Neuronal activity was recorded from four Utah arrays implanted in primary motor and premotor cortices in three rhesus macaque monkeys during 10 recording sessions over a 15- to 17-day period. A unit was defined as stable through a given day if the stability criterion was satisfied on all recordings leading up to that day. We found that 57% of the original units were stable through 7 days, 43% were stable through 10 days, and 39% were stable through 15 days. Moreover, stable units were more likely to remain stable in subsequent recording sessions (i.e., 89% of the neurons that were stable through four sessions remained stable on the fifth). Using both waveform and ISIH data instead of just waveforms improved performance by reducing the number of false positives. We also demonstrate that this method can be used to track neurons across days, even during adaptation to a visuomotor rotation. Identifying a stable subset of neurons should allow the study of long-term learning effects across days and has practical implications for pooling of behavioral data across days and for increasing the effectiveness of brain–machine interfaces.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Hatsopoulos, Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 (E-mail: nicho{at}uchicago.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.