JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 914-930, 2009. First published May 27, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91324.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures and Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/914    most recent
91324.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gritsenko, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kalaska, J. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gritsenko, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kalaska, J. F.

Integration of Predictive Feedforward and Sensory Feedback Signals for Online Control of Visually Guided Movement

V. Gritsenko, S. Yakovenko and J. F. Kalaska

Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central, Département de Physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Submitted 16 December 2008; accepted in final form 26 May 2009

Online control of movement requires complex integration of predictive central feedforward and peripheral sensory feedback signals. We studied the hand trajectories of human subjects pointing to visual targets that abruptly changed locations by different amounts and modeled the mechanism of rapid online correction using a dynamic model of a two-joint limb. Small unperceived and large detected target displacements could be attributed to different origins (motor execution errors vs. environmental changes, respectively) and compensated differently. However, the behavioral findings indicate that the rapid feedback pathway is recruited regardless of the amplitude or subjective awareness of target displacement and that the size of the earliest correction is always proportional to the amplitude of the target displacement over the tested range of perturbations. The modeling findings suggest that the rapid online corrections can be accomplished by superimposing a dynamically appropriate error correction signal onto the outgoing feedforward motor command to the original target. Furthermore, the modeling shows that the online correction mechanism must include compensation for the dynamic mechanical properties of the limb and for sensory delays in its error-correction pathway.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. Gritsenko, Dépt. de Physiologie, Univ. de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada (E-mail: valeriya.gritsenko{at}umontreal.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott
Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.