JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 941-952, 2009. First published May 27, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00222.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/941    most recent
00222.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ji, W.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ji, W.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.

Tone-Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of Inferior Colliculus Elicited by Pseudo-Conditioning: Role of Acetylcholine and Auditory and Somatosensory Cortices

Weiqing Ji and Nobuo Suga

Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 13 March 2009; accepted in final form 25 May 2009

Experience-dependent plasticity in the central sensory systems depends on activation of both the sensory and neuromodulatory systems. Sensitization or nonspecific augmentation of central auditory neurons elicited by pseudo-conditioning with unpaired conditioning tonal (CS) and unconditioned electric leg (US) stimuli is quite different from tone-specific plasticity, called best frequency (BF) shifts, of the neurons elicited by auditory fear conditioning with paired CS and US. Therefore the neural circuits eliciting the nonspecific augmentation must be different from that eliciting the BF shifts. We first examined plastic changes in the response properties of collicular neurons of the big brown bat elicited by pseudo-conditioning and found that it elicited prominent nonspecific augmentation—an auditory response increase, a frequency-tuning broadening, and a threshold decreas—and that, in addition, it elicited a small short-lasting BF shift only when the CS frequency was 5 kHz lower than the BF of a recorded neuron. We examined the role of acetylcholine and the auditory and somatosensory cortices in these collicular changes. The development of the nonspecific augmentation was affected little by a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist applied to the inferior colliculus and by a GABAA receptor agonist applied to the auditory or somatosensory cortex. However, these drugs abolished the small short-lasting BF shift as they abolished the large long-lasting cortical and short-lasting collicular BF shifts elicited by the conditioning. These results indicate that, different from the BF shift, the nonspecific augmentation of the inferior colliculus depends on neither the cholinergic neuromodulator nor the auditory and somatosensory cortices.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. Ji, Dept. of Biology, Washington Univ., One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130 (E-mail: ji{at}biology.wustl.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.